Steve
Hero Protagonist
Posts: 3,633
|
Post by Steve on Aug 24, 2024 13:14:34 GMT
I read them all, did you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2024 13:17:11 GMT
Of course I read them, what point are you making? It's you who's engaging in "go figure" posting as usual
I can't be bothered with it, either make a point or don't waste my time
|
|
Steve
Hero Protagonist
Posts: 3,633
|
Post by Steve on Aug 24, 2024 13:36:40 GMT
|
|
Steve
Hero Protagonist
Posts: 3,633
|
Post by Steve on Aug 24, 2024 13:37:51 GMT
There you go again. Wild exagerations. Those of us that know and use the English language know that LATE accounts is not the same as NO accounts. Maybe you realise this too now. Now who's inventing More Fiction ^ Read the links (plural) again. It's a fact that no receipts or invoices were returned in one of the cases I linked - that is separate to the late accounts in IIRC the last link. Reading Is Fundamental Which link and which words in it relevant to the Scottish referendum? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2024 13:40:35 GMT
Yes, you seem to be saying I was wrong in saying "Russia cheated and manipulated", despite the fact that's exactly what they did. You don't see false allegations about what happened as a way of cheating and manipulating something then I presume by trying to discredit it? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2024 13:41:15 GMT
Now who's inventing More Fiction ^ Read the links (plural) again. It's a fact that no receipts or invoices were returned in one of the cases I linked - that is separate to the late accounts in IIRC the last link. Reading Is Fundamental Which link and which words in it relevant to the Scottish referendum? The BBC link about "Better Together" and their 57k of spending which had no invoices or receipts? |
|
Steve
Hero Protagonist
Posts: 3,633
|
Post by Steve on Aug 24, 2024 13:59:03 GMT
Your assertion was about that Better Together 'It's a fact that no receipts or invoices were returned'
But it was utter bollocks, malevolent bollocks in fact. There was a £1.5M limit on spend and Better Together spent only £1,422,602 it total INCLUDING that 57k. So there was no illegality affecting the voting or result. So far from 'no receipts or invoices' they actually submitted them for 96% of relevant spend. You were making a false smear.
And as per your own link 'The Electoral Commission said it took into account that the responsible person for the organisation made efforts to provide further supporting documentation after the deadline for the report had passed.'
Your links do not support your assertion that the Scot referendum should be rerun because of supposed illegality.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2024 14:06:36 GMT
Your assertion was about that Better Together 'It's a fact that no receipts or invoices were returned' But it was utter bollocks, malevolent bollocks in fact. There was a £1.5M limit on spend and Better Together spent only £1,422,602 it total INCLUDING that 57k. So there was no illegality affecting the voting or result. So far from 'no receipts or invoices' they actually submitted them for 96% of relevant spend. You were making a false smear. And as per your own link 'The Electoral Commission said it took into account that the responsible person for the organisation made efforts to provide further supporting documentation after the deadline for the report had passed.'Your links do not support your assertion that the Scot referendum should be rerun because of supposed illegality. "relevant spend" Oh so 57k of money isn't relevant? And then you accuse me of smearing. I love the way you say "only" 1.4 million like it's nothing and say "only" 57k like it's nothing and has no discernible effect on the vote. They got fined for not keeping invoices for 57k of spending, Russia interfered with the referendum, the other side got fined too as I recall and there were supposedly videos of ballot fraud. Using your fanatical Remainer logic that the Brexit ref must be rerun (that's the logic I'm using here - yours), the referendum should be rerun as that constitutes "record breaking illegality". Now do you see how absurd your own logic is? That's what I was trying to point out to you - the double standards, I made that very clear from the outset of this thread when we first started - I said I'm using your own standards |
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Aug 24, 2024 14:37:25 GMT
So you can't click on links? I told you what they were about quite clearly in all the posts and you still refuse to click them. Then don't click on them, don't whine about "go figure" posting when I told you what they're about. All you seem to want to do is pretend no one committed any unethical or illegal actions in Scot Indy ref, but that's typical of Brit Nats? The trouble with links is that they are often to whole articles. It is polite and often necessary to paste the bit you consider relevant. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2024 14:42:13 GMT
I'll happily oblige for other posters such as yourself, but not ones who seem to enjoy being impolite as a matter of course. I see no reason why I should do otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Aug 24, 2024 14:49:04 GMT
I'll happily oblige for other posters such as yourself, but not ones who seem to enjoy being impolite as a matter of course. I see no reason why I should do otherwise. Your choice. I wont make you, I'm just pointing out why people do it. |
|
Steve
Hero Protagonist
Posts: 3,633
|
Post by Steve on Aug 24, 2024 15:03:09 GMT
I'll happily oblige for other posters such as yourself, but not ones who seem to enjoy being impolite as a matter of course. I see no reason why I should do otherwise. That'd be the man in your mirror then with your endless accusations of supposed dishonesty and your cross forum sniping. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2024 15:12:39 GMT
I'll happily oblige for other posters such as yourself, but not ones who seem to enjoy being impolite as a matter of course. I see no reason why I should do otherwise. That'd be the man in your mirror then with your endless accusations of supposed dishonesty and your cross forum sniping. The impoliteness with accusing so many of 'illiteracy' among countless other things is known to all but yourself, try to be more polite and you will get a politer response What more is there to say? |
|
Steve
Hero Protagonist
Posts: 3,633
|
Post by Steve on Aug 24, 2024 15:21:10 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2024 15:24:01 GMT
Double standards is now considered in the same class of slur with regards to calling people supporters of terrorism, being illiterate ... etc etc
Ok, whatever floats your boat
|
|
