|
|
Post by Orac on Jul 22, 2024 23:37:53 GMT
If you have evidence that Trump stormed the Capitol, you should share it. As for the rapist thing - you realise there was no evidence that Trump was even at the scene of the crime at the time of the crime, nor was even determined when (to the nearest few years) the crime supposedly took place? It might be simpler to just say, there was no real evidence of a crime or evidence that Trump was involved - or even, more simply, there was just no evidence (full stop) In this light, you waving the word 'rapist' around casually is equivalent to standing on stage and deciding to shove your head up your backside to see if anyone claps. What an accomplished contortionist you are One court has found him guilty of sexual assault and there are about 25 other accusations waiting to be tried. The only thing stopping Trump from joining his mob at the Capitol was his secret service team. According to one witness he tried to grab the steering wheel when he was refused. "Found guilty, but without any evidence" would alert any intelligent and reasonably honest person that nothing at all could have been 'found'. The witness in question has clarified - there was no such event. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2024 23:44:30 GMT
Disagreed, he clearly incited the riot and started that insurrection with both his actions and words over many years. However, applying this standard generally would mean that rafts of politicians were convicted on incitement charges at every occurrence of political violence. That sounds a little unwieldy to me., Funny how everyone forgets about that 18 month long arson, assault, theft and vandalism spree that, was not only arguably incited by political rhetoric, but was explicitly backed by many significant political figures. And many Dem politicians incited it, so lock them up for that too Do you see a double standard? |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jul 22, 2024 23:45:29 GMT
However, applying this standard generally would mean that rafts of politicians were convicted on incitement charges at every occurrence of political violence. That sounds a little unwieldy to me., Funny how everyone forgets about that 18 month long arson, assault, theft and vandalism spree that, was not only arguably incited by political rhetoric, but was explicitly backed by many significant political figures. And many Dem politicians incited it, so lock them up for that too Do you see a double standard? Yes - but not one you appear to be weildling |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2024 23:49:31 GMT
How would you know what I have or haven't said about Dem politicians?
You make an awful lot of assumptions about people's positions don't you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jul 22, 2024 23:55:34 GMT
How would you know what I have or haven't said about Dem politicians? You make an awful lot of assumptions about people's positions don't you? Just to clarify - all i can see is what you are posting. So when i say "I see no double standard you are wielding", This would be based on what you say to me. I haven't trawled through your memories with a mind reading machine. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2024 0:01:37 GMT
Ah ok, I misread that earlier post, my bad  I misread it as "one you appear to be wielding" |
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Jul 23, 2024 8:03:14 GMT
Well you know how anti conspiracy I am, but this time I'm not so sure. Oops! It looks l;like that may be wrong. Apologies I think the conspiracy is more about how that roof was left uncovered and the refusal of requests for more security. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jul 23, 2024 8:07:26 GMT
Oops! It looks l;like that may be wrong. Apologies I think the conspiracy is more about how that roof was left uncovered and the refusal of requests for more security. Yes I think i watched a you-tube video with a dodgy map or i went cross-eyed for a few seconds |
|
I misread it as "one you appear to be wielding"