scotland keeping the lights on in England

1) Fossil fuels are burned to create wind turbines. 30% of the carbon footprint of a wind turbine is steel. The other 70% is composite materials including glass reinforced plastic. CO2 is pumped into the atmosphere still, at production stage.

2) Are there no other materials that could be used, which would create a recyclable product, or a repairable product?

3) Wind power at present has not produced enough consistent power to replace the amount of power we put into the grid 20 years ago.
The cost is very high, including the cost of dealing with the waste byproducts, and it is pushing up people's bills.

4) If you really want to address climate change, you need to pull CO2 from the atmosphere and turn it into fuel.
There's a high energy cost in doing that, but it can be done.
Best way to do it, solar, not wind.

Our country is not best placed for solar power, but solar is still a better option than wind.

A good alternative to the large conventional power stations we're still using would be Thorium nuclear power stations as Thorium reactors do not produce thermonuclear weapons grade byproducts and cannot melt down either.
When fusion is commercially available, then we should build fusion power stations as well.

Meanwhile:
Work with the Commonwealth.

Set up solar power stations in hot politically stable countries to power carbon capture equipment.
They can then commercially capture and transport carbon dioxide as a fuel precursor whilst at the coast of Commonwealth nations, commercial hydrogen electrolysis takes place along with synthesis of hydrocarbon fuels to create a closed cycle renewable fuel that every conventional car can run on.

Think big.

A huge amount of our electricity comes from burning fossil fuels. How do you think biomass gets here?

Diesel lorries in the USA, diesel trains, oil powered freighters. Our green credentials are a lie.

And all the carbon dioxide involved in carting gear to do with wind farms around too. Yet fibreglass/ carbon fibre repair tech isn't used to repair turbine blades. Wind is intermittent, not constant. Sometimes it is too strong to safely operate turbines sometimes too weak.

Tidal energy is constant, but not adequately harnessed.

And there's a fixation on using the wrong materials.

Simplify the process of making wind turbines. Use recyclable materials such as aluminium for the turbine blades.

6 percent. And government classes it as being carbon neutral without taking into the carbon footprint of the supply chain, or considering the carbon sponge effect the trees would have if they hadn't been cut down.

We should have continued using coal UNTIL sufficient viable alternatives were in place. Amber Rudd has a lot to answer for. She is responsible for the energy fiasco we now have, and she left Parliament five years ago.

Local coal has a lower carbon footprint than imported coal due to lower supply chain carbon footprint, and therefore steel production with local coal is viable. She trashed our steel industry too. I could blame the EU, but our politicians implemented the coal divestment policy even after we voted to leave. And they implemented it without watt for watt replacement in the grid. We are still playing catch up a decade on.

Between them, Arthur Scargil and Margaret Thatcher destroyed our coal industry.
Scargil by stubbornly pursuing an unwinnable strike and Thatcher due to her globalist policies which led her to buy cheaper Chinese coal.
Coal would be too expensive to start up again now. All the easy to get at coal has been mined and the deep mines are flooded.
A good thing too, coal is a 19th century fuel. It's filthy, poisonous and very unpleasant and dangerous to extract.
The age of coal is over. Good riddance.

They had a reason and ultimately were judged to have been right

The mine owners at Betteshanger were, on a pretext, refusing to pay the minimum wage and abusing the wartime regulations to get away with it.  About a year later all the miners that were convicted received full pardons with all fines refunded.

None of which addresses the point.
Coal, when mined locally, and then de-sulphurised, is not as bad for the environment.