Saint
Observer
Posts: 1,111
Member is Online
|
Post by Saint on Jan 29, 2024 1:17:06 GMT
The mountain gorilla was discovered less than a century ago. Is the idea of Bigfoot really that bizarre?
|
|
|
Post by montegriffo on Jan 29, 2024 1:33:47 GMT
No but there would probably be hard evidence by now. Where are the bones?
|
|
Saint
Observer
Posts: 1,111
Member is Online
|
Post by Saint on Jan 29, 2024 1:37:50 GMT
No but there would probably be hard evidence by now. Where are the bones? I imagine the bones of mountain gorillas are distinctive. Our not having discovered them didn't mean mountain gorillas didn't exist until a century ago.
|
|
|
Post by montegriffo on Jan 29, 2024 2:49:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by montegriffo on Jan 29, 2024 2:54:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Beethoven Moment on Jan 29, 2024 10:22:08 GMT
Okay, first discovered by Westerners, then. But who's to say there isn't a Bigfoot known only to a similarly small group of natives? If it was possible with mountain gorillas, why isn't it possible with other species? For some reason, I can't log in as Saint at the moment. And I can't post using a member's name.
|
|
|
Post by montegriffo on Jan 29, 2024 12:43:18 GMT
There are far fewer isolated communities than there were in 1847 when the first gorilla skull was found or 1902 when the first pair were shot and recorded. Many expeditions have tried and failed to find bigfoot including a long search for the yeti by Sir Edmund Hillary after he conquered Everest.
I just think that if bigfoot really existed he would have been found by now.
Same with the Loch Ness monster and the clitoris.
|
|
|
Post by Beethoven Moment on Jan 29, 2024 12:55:43 GMT
There are far fewer isolated communities than there were in 1847 when the first gorilla skull was found or 1902 when the first pair were shot and recorded. Many expeditions have tried and failed to find bigfoot including a long search for the yeti by Sir Edmund Hillary after he conquered Everest. I just think that if bigfoot really existed he would have been found by now. Same with the Loch Ness monster and the clitoris. I'm not sure, but I think a whole tribe was discovered relatively recently. As for the clitoris, you obviously haven't heard of the cannibal tribe of militant lesbians recently discovered living wild in a squat in New Guinea.
|
|
|
Post by montegriffo on Jan 29, 2024 13:36:40 GMT
There are far fewer isolated communities than there were in 1847 when the first gorilla skull was found or 1902 when the first pair were shot and recorded. Many expeditions have tried and failed to find bigfoot including a long search for the yeti by Sir Edmund Hillary after he conquered Everest. I just think that if bigfoot really existed he would have been found by now. Same with the Loch Ness monster and the clitoris. I'm not sure, but I think a whole tribe was discovered relatively recently. As for the clitoris, you obviously haven't heard of the cannibal tribe of militant lesbians recently discovered living wild in a squat in New Guinea. In the Amazon rain forest, not somewhere that bigfoot has previously been claimed to live.
|
|
|
Post by Beethoven Moment on Jan 29, 2024 14:07:58 GMT
I'm not sure, but I think a whole tribe was discovered relatively recently. As for the clitoris, you obviously haven't heard of the cannibal tribe of militant lesbians recently discovered living wild in a squat in New Guinea. In the Amazon rain forest, not somewhere that bigfoot has previously been claimed to live. I was discussing 'a' bigfoot, rather than previous claims of his existing in certain areas. I'm sure there have been 'sightings' all round the world. I'm not for one moment suggesting that a species of 'bigfoot' is living in each of those areas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2024 10:08:52 GMT
It is not impossible that there may exist an as yet undiscovered great ape. If such a creature is reasonably intelligent, naturally prefers to live in remote areas and is smart enough to avoid us, and perhaps disposes of it's dead in some way - burial? cannibalism? - in remote places where we are highly unlikely to stumble across remains, it is not entirely unfeasible for such a creature to exist.
I am reminded of the case of the Coelacanth, a type of fish whose fossilised remains had been found and was thought to have been extinct for some 50 million years - until they caught one alive and well in 1938!!!
So it's possible
|
|