|
Post by Zany on Sept 15, 2024 22:27:06 GMT
So if Carlos wants his crew to move the super yacht from the Virgin Islands to Monaco ready for his next holiday, how many people do we need to cull to offset the carbon footprint. What are you asking me for I’m not Carlos,saying life ain’t fair is merely an observation of how life is. Why instead of targeting Carlos don’t you address the Chinese India and all the other coal burners? No but you are the guy suggesting a better alternative to cutting Carlos's excesses is to not have other people live (or breed) And Carlos is figurative, but his excesses are in part the reason China and India burn so much coal
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2024 23:50:01 GMT
What are you asking me for I’m not Carlos,saying life ain’t fair is merely an observation of how life is. Why instead of targeting Carlos don’t you address the Chinese India and all the other coal burners? No but you are the guy suggesting a better alternative to cutting Carlos's excesses is to not have other people live (or breed) And Carlos is figurative, but his excesses are in part the reason China and India burn so much coal You are the past master at making things up I didn’t say,I said there are too many people on the planet and there are imo but I didn’t say other people shouldn’t live or breed that’s not my choice. And all the figurative characters you want to make up might well consume too much but if you eliminated all of them it would make no difference because some amongst the strugglers will take their place,it’s what humanity does . Do you think all the western billionaires or the Putins, Kim il what’s his name or Xi and all the aid grabbers in the poor countries give a stuff about the plebs. I know depressing ain’t it?
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Sept 16, 2024 7:03:58 GMT
No but you are the guy suggesting a better alternative to cutting Carlos's excesses is to not have other people live (or breed) And Carlos is figurative, but his excesses are in part the reason China and India burn so much coal You are the past master at making things up I didn’t say,I said there are too many people on the planet and there are imo but I didn’t say other people shouldn’t live or breed that’s not my choice. And all the figurative characters you want to make up might well consume too much but if you eliminated all of them it would make no difference because some amongst the strugglers will take their place,it’s what humanity does . Do you think all the western billionaires or the Putins, Kim il what’s his name or Xi and all the aid grabbers in the poor countries give a stuff about the plebs. I know depressing ain’t it? Then why did you say it in relation to this subject. This is something you do on nearly every thread. Say something and then spend the next four pages arguing you didn't. The article does not claim it will be done, it merely points out the consequence of it not changing. However I would point out that very many countries China included are concerned about climate change and world health
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2024 8:50:55 GMT
You are the past master at making things up I didn’t say,I said there are too many people on the planet and there are imo but I didn’t say other people shouldn’t live or breed that’s not my choice. And all the figurative characters you want to make up might well consume too much but if you eliminated all of them it would make no difference because some amongst the strugglers will take their place,it’s what humanity does . Do you think all the western billionaires or the Putins, Kim il what’s his name or Xi and all the aid grabbers in the poor countries give a stuff about the plebs. I know depressing ain’t it? Then why did you say it in relation to this subject. This is something you do on nearly every thread. Say something and then spend the next four pages arguing you didn't. The article does not claim it will be done, it merely points out the consequence of it not changing. However I would point out that very many countries China included are concerned about climate change and world health Why did I say it? because I believe it to be true it’s my opinion anyway but for people to then argue I’m the guy who wants to not to let people live or breed,good god I don’t want people to live makes it sound I want them all dead which is patently not true. Take this scenario a thread on the danger of Trump being next president, I post it would be better if people like Trump did not exist (and it would imo) someone comes along and says you’re the guy that wants him dead. Of course I will argue that’s not what I said because that is untrue. I have in fact in the past said similar though I have said that’s not my choice and it isn’t it’s the choice of the US voters and if they’re daft enough so be it. If I argue against others interpretations of what I say why is that unfair would you be happy to see your thoughts twisted without comment? To this point of yours The cynic in me would reply,window dressing the Chinese are intent on extending their hegemony and becoming the next world superpower ,which they are grabbing territory extending their influence. The Chinese are concerned about their own well being and health or at least their leaders are. I see humour in many things you would disapprove of and am cynical and a realist,it’s a forum disagree but if I think you’re wrong I will argue the toss. Thats me,you also have the option of saying you are not what we want here and I’ll sod off. I might post a parting shot though I think you have a view of how this forum should be,again it’s my opinion you (and others) are preoccupied with another place,you shouldn’t this is another forum forget what went before and ruminating on what is perceived as undesirables and not being that other place or how you’re better than another forum. A forum is the sum total of all its members and if you exclude dissenting voices then it’s pointless and none of it matters or anyway nobody that matters takes a blind bit of notice of this or any other forum it’s a place to air your thought and opinions. And on that note I’ll log off for a while if I can’t log on again I’ve got the message.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2024 18:49:43 GMT
Then why did you say it in relation to this subject. This is something you do on nearly every thread. Say something and then spend the next four pages arguing you didn't. The article does not claim it will be done, it merely points out the consequence of it not changing. However I would point out that very many countries China included are concerned about climate change and world health Why did I say it? because I believe it to be true it’s my opinion anyway but for people to then argue I’m the guy who wants to not to let people live or breed,good god I don’t want people to live makes it sound I want them all dead which is patently not true. Take this scenario a thread on the danger of Trump being next president, I post it would be better if people like Trump did not exist (and it would imo) someone comes along and says you’re the guy that wants him dead. Of course I will argue that’s not what I said because that is untrue. I have in fact in the past said similar though I have said that’s not my choice and it isn’t it’s the choice of the US voters and if they’re daft enough so be it. If I argue against others interpretations of what I say why is that unfair would you be happy to see your thoughts twisted without comment? To this point of yours The cynic in me would reply,window dressing the Chinese are intent on extending their hegemony and becoming the next world superpower ,which they are grabbing territory extending their influence. The Chinese are concerned about their own well being and health or at least their leaders are. I see humour in many things you would disapprove of and am cynical and a realist,it’s a forum disagree but if I think you’re wrong I will argue the toss. Thats me,you also have the option of saying you are not what we want here and I’ll sod off. I might post a parting shot though I think you have a view of how this forum should be,again it’s my opinion you (and others) are preoccupied with another place,you shouldn’t this is another forum forget what went before and ruminating on what is perceived as undesirables and not being that other place or how you’re better than another forum. A forum is the sum total of all its members and if you exclude dissenting voices then it’s pointless and none of it matters or anyway nobody that matters takes a blind bit of notice of this or any other forum it’s a place to air your thought and opinions. And on that note I’ll log off for a while if I can’t log on again I’ve got the message. You are doing what I am prone to do when outnumbered, which is get crotchety for a while then flounce off for a bit. This thread is about inequality and the harm it will do humanity. You brought overpopulation into the mix, implying that inequality wouldn't be a problem if there were less of us. You never said anyone living shouldnt be but clearly you were suggesting that as a species we should be breeding less, the only way to reduce our numbers without some form of untimely death for some of us. I put forward very valid reasons in regards to the top heaviness of our societies if too few young people are born and that for this to be manageable more older people need to remain productive for longer when they can, and the birth rate needs to decline a little. For this to be even manageable in the long run it will take many decades to reduce our numbers significantly. In the meantime we have the separate and more immediate problem of inequality which governments ought to be able to address much more quickly if only the will were there. Reduced numbers might make inequality sustainable for longer, but will not remove it as a problem. The carbon footprints of the super rich of course are a big problem. You are also making the mistake of assuming that just because several different posters have picked your posts to pieces, that this means you are somehow unwelcome. In that you are very mistaken, though if you feel this forum is unbalanced you are free to invite members from yours to sign up here too. Most of us got to hear of this site having been invited by someone already here. The fact that this is my preferred - indeed for now only - politics forum, has nothing to do with it's politics and everything to do with it's low troll count. Because you are not a troll I am certain you are welcome here.
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Sept 16, 2024 19:36:04 GMT
The trouble with letting things slip for peace of mind as a mod is that if you let a few go unchallenged, then as soon as you step on a future comment you are accused of favouritism and bias.
So I invented the Green system to try and "advise" people before it got out to that point. One thing I didn't allow for is new members not knowing the green system and Monte not liking them.
Would any of you prefer Monte to take over from me, please say.
|
|
Steve
Hero Protagonist
Posts: 3,698
|
Post by Steve on Sept 16, 2024 19:57:05 GMT
I'd say listen to others but form your own view and don't let anyone think it's a voting system.
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Sept 16, 2024 20:03:43 GMT
I'd say listen to others but form your own view and don't let anyone think it's a voting system. The only vote is if members wish me to step down.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2024 20:22:24 GMT
I'd say listen to others but form your own view and don't let anyone think it's a voting system. The only vote is if members wish me to step down. I do not wish you to step down. What makes you think anyone wants that? And where has Monte said he doesn't like your modding system? Personally I think most other sites have more than one mod so why not both you and monte as mods? But if there is room for only one of you I am happy for you to stay. But if you feel a need to put it to a vote, I think it needs a thread of its own. But voting a mod into or out of office runs the risk of politically motivated decisions so I am not a fan of that. I don;t want mods being voted in or out on the basis of whether you agree with their politics or not which is a potential danger
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2024 20:30:33 GMT
The trouble with letting things slip for peace of mind as a mod is that if you let a few go unchallenged, then as soon as you step on a future comment you are accused of favouritism and bias. So I invented the Green system to try and "advise" people before it got out to that point. One thing I didn't allow for is new members not knowing the green system and Monte not liking them. Would any of you prefer Monte to take over from me, please say. The new member I think you are referring to is himself a mod of several years on a rival forum. He knows his own mind and has his own opinions and I do not always agree with them. But he and I have known each other for nearly 14 years now and though not all his arguments are always well thought out - though I suppose we can all be guilty of that every now and again - he tends not to troll and mostly plays the ball and not the man and brings some alternative viewpoints to the table, and he should be welcomed here for that. I don't want this forum to become a place that is unwelcoming to people who disagree with us too strongly. Opposing views are the lifeblood of forums like this. And whether or not Monte likes the person expressing them is utterly irrelevant. If anyone dislikes another member either get over it or block them. But no one should have any kind of political or moral veto on who is welcome here.
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Sept 16, 2024 20:36:24 GMT
The only vote is if members wish me to step down. I do not wish you to step down. What makes you think anyone wants that? And where has Monte said he doesn't like your modding system? Personally I think most other sites have more than one mod so why not both you and monte as mods? But if there is room for only one of you I am happy for you to stay. But if you feel a need to put it to a vote, I think it needs a thread of its own. But voting a mod into or out of office runs the risk of politically motivated decisions so I am not a fan of that. I don;t want mods being voted in or out on the basis of whether you agree with their politics or not which is a potential danger Monte has raised it himself more than once. He would prefer we used the more traditional reporting and private message style.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2024 20:45:44 GMT
I do not wish you to step down. What makes you think anyone wants that? And where has Monte said he doesn't like your modding system? Personally I think most other sites have more than one mod so why not both you and monte as mods? But if there is room for only one of you I am happy for you to stay. But if you feel a need to put it to a vote, I think it needs a thread of its own. But voting a mod into or out of office runs the risk of politically motivated decisions so I am not a fan of that. I don;t want mods being voted in or out on the basis of whether you agree with their politics or not which is a potential danger Monte has raised it himself more than once. Well I like Monte and all that, but on this one that is just his tough shit surely? You are a very fair minded mod, and you don't go throwing your weight around, deleting and sanctioning all over the place. I want you to stay and your green and red system is very easy to understand and newbies will pick it up soon enough. Besides did not what green and red means used to be spelled out under your avatar? Why did you remove it? You are uncharacteristically reacting like me in seeing a storm in a tea cup. I doubt that anyone here wants you to step down, and even if someone does, he will be greatly outnumbered by the rest of us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2024 20:50:58 GMT
I do not wish you to step down. What makes you think anyone wants that? And where has Monte said he doesn't like your modding system? Personally I think most other sites have more than one mod so why not both you and monte as mods? But if there is room for only one of you I am happy for you to stay. But if you feel a need to put it to a vote, I think it needs a thread of its own. But voting a mod into or out of office runs the risk of politically motivated decisions so I am not a fan of that. I don;t want mods being voted in or out on the basis of whether you agree with their politics or not which is a potential danger Monte has raised it himself more than once. He would prefer we used the more traditional reporting and private message style. Believe it or not the more traditional style is to report privately but for mods to react publicly, warning or editing for all to see....the green red system is actually an improvement on that. Why should what Monte wants count for any more than what I or anyone else wants?
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Sept 16, 2024 21:20:44 GMT
Monte has raised it himself more than once. He would prefer we used the more traditional reporting and private message style. Believe it or not the more traditional style is to report privately but for mods to react publicly, warning or editing for all to see....the green red system is actually an improvement on that. Why should what Monte wants count for any more than what I or anyone else wants? Because he and Saint set up this forum. Somehow its in the name of Orac and he made me mod. Didn't know the politics involved, just accepted.
|
|
|
Post by Zany on Sept 16, 2024 21:25:16 GMT
Monte has raised it himself more than once. Well I like Monte and all that, but on this one that is just his tough shit surely? You are a very fair minded mod, and you don't go throwing your weight around, deleting and sanctioning all over the place. I want you to stay and your green and red system is very easy to understand and newbies will pick it up soon enough. Besides did not what green and red means used to be spelled out under your avatar? Why did you remove it? You are uncharacteristically reacting like me in seeing a storm in a tea cup. I doubt that anyone here wants you to step down, and even if someone does, he will be greatly outnumbered by the rest of us. Thanks Benn. I'm calm, I just asked if Borg0 was right and people would like me to stop modding. Its important that the mod is a servant not a ruler.
|
|